One of the basic assumptions in the study of the history of ideas is that conceptions, and sometimes even ideals, tend to change or adapt themselves in accordance with a changing realty. Indeed, research that does not take this into consideration is liable to suffer from essentialism and adopt a fixated approach that views ideology as a static collection of ideas. However, we sometimes find, as in the case before us, that a set of ideas can survive over a long period, even generations, during which there is no significant change. This mainly occurs when the bodies that shaped these ideas also continue to exist for a long time.
This essay analyzes four basic elements of the accepted worldview of fundamentalist Islam, which have existed for more than a century: there is a continuous clash of civilizations between Islam and modernism; the worldview that stems from this is abnormal and unacceptable; the desire to change the abnormal reality becomes a struggle that takes various forms; and finally, there is a clear vision of how this struggle will end, and certainty about the future of Islam and non-Islam cultures. The essay deals with the development of these concepts over several generations of Islamist thinking: from Hasan al-Banna to Ayman al-Zawahiri; from Sayyd Qutb to Abu baseer al-Tartusi.
While dealing with these issues, the essay uncovers the significant theological aspect that guides Islamist discourse, and provides an in-depth view of the origins and patterns of the ethos of "resistance." Stemming from these, it examines Islamism as a kind of Hobbesianism.