Balaban, H., Drew, T., & Luria, R. (2023). Dissociable online integration processes in visual working memory. Cerebral Cortex, bhad378.
Balaban, H., Assaf, D., Arad Meir, M., & Luria, R. (2020). Different features of real-world objects are represented in a dependent manner in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(7), 1275-1293. IF: 3.49, Q1 Psychology, Experimental: 12 of 88.
Balaban, H., Fukuda, K., & Luria, R. (2019). What can half a million change detection trials tell us about visual working memory? Cognition, 191, 103984. IF: 3.53, Q1 Psychology, Experimental: 11 of 88.
Balaban, H., Drew, T., & Luria, R. (2019). Neural evidence for an object-based pointer system underlying working memory. Cortex, 119, 362-372. IF: 4.27, Q1 Behavioral Sciences: 5 of 53.
Balaban, H., Drew, T., & Luria, R. (2018). Delineating resetting and updating in visual working memory based on the object-to-representation correspondence. Neuropsychologia, 113, 85-94. IF: 2.87, Q1 Behavioral Sciences: 13 of 53.
Balaban, H., Drew, T., & Luria, R. (2018). Visual working memory can selectively reset a subset of its representations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(5), 1877-1883. IF: 3.09, Q1 Psychology, Experimental: 14 of 85.
Balaban, H., & Luria, R. (2017). Neural and behavioral evidence for an online resetting process in visual working memory. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37(5), 1225-1239. IF: 6.07, Q1 Neurosciences: 29 of 267.
Balaban, H., & Luria, R. (2016). Object representations in visual working memory change according to the task context. Cortex, 1-13. IF: 5.12, Q1 Neurosciences: 37 of 252.
Balaban, H., & Luria, R. (2016). Integration of distinct objects in visual working memory depends on strong objecthood cues even for different-dimension conjunctions. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 2093-2104. IF: 8.66, Q1 Neurosciences: 16 of 252.
Luria, R., Balaban, H., Awh, E., & Vogel, E. K. (2016). The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 62, 100-108. IF: 8.8, Q1 Neurosciences: 15 of 252.
Balaban, H., & Luria, R. (2015). The number of objects determines visual working memory capacity allocation for complex items. NeuroImage, 119, 54-62. IF: 6.35, Q1 Neurosciences: 24 of 252.
Allon, A. S.,
Balaban, H., & Luria, R. (2014). How low can you go? Changing the resolution of novel complex objects in visual working memory according to task demands.
Frontiers in Psychology, 5:265,
doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2-14.00265. IF: 2.56, Q1 Psychology, Multidisciplinary: 23 of 129.