Chais2025_Heb_and_Eng-web
ע 131 לאורה לוין, סיגל - חוה רותם, ישראל צימרמן Hirt, C. N., Karlen, Y., Merki, K. M., & Suter, F. (2021). What makes high achievers different from low achievers? Self-regulated learners in the context of a high-stakes academic long-term task. Learning and Individual Differences , 92 , 102085. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINDIF.2021.102085 Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research , 15 (9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687 Huang, C. Y., &Wang, J. C. (2022). Effectiveness of a three-dimensional-printing curriculum: Developing and evaluating an elementary school design-oriented model course. Computers & Education , 187 , 104553. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2022.104553 Iversen, S. M., & Larson, C. (2006). Simple thinking using complex math vs. complex thinking using simple math – A study using model eliciting activities to compare students' abilities in standardized tests to their modelling abilities. ZDM , 38 (3), 281–292. Levin, L., & Rotem, S. H. (accepted). Opportunities for low-achieving students to learn mathematics through design and 3D printing of usable objects. CERME25. Levin, L., & Verner, I. (2021). Student practice in 3D design and printing for promoting analytical and applied mathematical thinking skills. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy , 11 (3), 39–53. Ng, C., Bartlett, B., & Elliott, S. N. (2018). Engaging in learning: the challenges and consequences for students from challenging backgrounds. In Empowering Engagement (pp. 1–16). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94652-8_1 Talbi, O., & Ouared, A. (2022). Goal-oriented student motivation in learning analytics: How can a requirements-driven approach help? Education and Information Technologies , 27 (9), 12083–12121. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-022-11091-8/FIGURES/21 Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications . Sage Publications.
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODc3OTcw